# question of EEA3

2 posters

Page

**1**of**1**## question of EEA3

In EEA3 ,why should we limit the length of message to be encryted to 20000 bits ?

what if the number is biger than that?

**anycall_w**- Posts : 3

Join date : 2011-07-15

## RE: question of EEA3

The algorithm could perfectly well handle much bigger message lengths. The limit comes from the context - it's the maximum size of an LTE packet.anycall_w wrote:

In EEA3 ,why should we limit the length of message to be encryted to 20000 bits ?

what if the number is biger than that?

Having said that, though, we realised that the value 20000 is wrong. The maximum size of an LTE packet is in fact 65504 bits. This has been corrected in the latest version, which I hope will be published very soon.

**Steve Babbage**- Posts : 30

Join date : 2010-08-02

## Re: question of EEA3

Steve Babbage wrote:The algorithm could perfectly well handle much bigger message lengths. The limit comes from the context - it's the maximum size of an LTE packet.anycall_w wrote:

In EEA3 ,why should we limit the length of message to be encryted to 20000 bits ?

what if the number is biger than that?

Having said that, though, we realised that the value 20000 is wrong. The maximum size of an LTE packet is in fact 65504 bits. This has been corrected in the latest version, which I hope will be published very soon.

thanks a million , I appreciate your help.

**anycall_w**- Posts : 3

Join date : 2011-07-15

Similar topics

» question of EEA3

» please give me EIA3&EEA3 test data document,thanks

» 1.one question about the LFSR

» QUESTION Icannot understang

» Difference between Version 1.4 and Version 1.5 of 128-EEA3 and 128-EIA3

» please give me EIA3&EEA3 test data document,thanks

» 1.one question about the LFSR

» QUESTION Icannot understang

» Difference between Version 1.4 and Version 1.5 of 128-EEA3 and 128-EIA3

Page

**1**of**1****Permissions in this forum:**

**cannot**reply to topics in this forum